Speakers
- Frederico Singarajah – Gatehouse Chambers
- Jeffrey Elkinson – Carey Olsen
- Professor Loukas Mistelis – Partner, Clyde & Co
- Gretta Walters – Chaffetz Lindsey
- Niamh Leinwather – Secretary General, VIAC
- Spaces: 60
- Venue: Gatehouse Chambers, Gatehouse Chambers, 1 Lady Hale Gate, Gray’s Inn, London,, WC1X 8BS
What this session will cover
Do dissenting opinions serve any useful purpose that an award by majority would not achieve, or do they potentially amount to a breach of the so called tribunal’s duty to render an enforceable award?
Dissenting opinions have specific provisions in ISDS, such as article 48(4) of the ICSID Rules 2022. In commercial arbitrations, they have been tacitly allowed but ordinarily lack any express provision. In that context, do dissenting opinions serve any useful purpose that an award by majority would not achieve, or do they potentially amount to a breach of the so-called tribunal’s duty to render an enforceable award?
Member hosts
Gatehouse Chambers, Elkinson, Clyde & Co
